Master Chief charged as an accessory

I know a lot of people are going to be clamoring all over this case regarding a teen who killed his parents over the confiscation of his video game, calling for the immediate and permanent destruction of every “violent” (good luck defining this concretely) game on the market, but before that happens, I would like to say a word on this topic.

Violence in video games and its (apparent) effect on those who enjoy gaming has been an issue for quite awhile, thanks in particular to the brilliant work of one Jack Thompson, who – thank God – has been disbarred permanently from practicing law.  Nevertheless, there are plenty to take up his mantle, and I’m sure this story in particular will jumpstart their position.

The judge who heard this case had a few parting words regarding the teen.  Essentially, he saw the insanity plea the teen’s lawyers utilized as utterly without water, but still advocated that Halo 3 had some sort of effect on the teen’s decision-making abilities.

H’ok.  So.

I will begin by saying this: of course gaming has a biochemical effect on people.  Of course the type of the game someone is playing creates detectably different biochemical effects on people.  But here is where I stop.

Let me be absolutely clear: violent video games do not cause violent acts. Period.

Playing video games does produce a biochemical change in the people playing them.  Hell, that’s why we enjoy gaming.  But just about every other life experience has an effect as well – watching movies, driving cars, doing homework, sleeping…every action has a discernible chemical effect that can influence our subsequent actions.

Here’s the crux of my argument: if the person commits a violent act, they are in need of help.  With that comes the following: they shouldn’t be watching movies, they shouldn’t be driving, they shouldn’t be playing video games.  They should be getting help, seeking medical attention, undergoing therapy, and being treated for their condition.  If they are unable to tell the difference between the virtual reality of Halo 3 and the honest-to-goodness universe around us, then Halo 3 should not even be in the picture.  Nor should there be weapons in the house, or violent movies readily available, or unsupervised driving outings, and so on.

Do you see my point?  It’s not that violent video games cause violent behavior, or that they are in any way different from other stimuli that can alter our moods and perceptions.  They are simply – yes, simply – another endeavor to be made aware of and approach rationally.  Everyone knows getting behind the wheel when exceptionally pissed off is a bad idea; so is playing violent video games when one mentally and emotionally cannot handle it.

Me and countless friends and acquaintances should have been wanted for mass murder years and years ago if violent video games really caused violent behavior, given the quantity and quality of games we have played for more than a decade.

Oh, and as for empirical evidence: the advocates against violent video games are very aware of the fact that graphics and realism of video games have improved enormously in the last few years.  What they seem to be omitting is the fact that the number of violent crimes within the primary gaming demographic – ages 12 through young adulthood – has decreased in the last several years.

For a personal anecdote, I knew someone many years ago (ancient history for some) who would play Mario Kart 64 with me, but would refuse to play Super Smash Brothers on the grounds that it was a violent game.  I have a few things to say about this:

  • Doing something on principle in concordance with your beliefs is fine.  I have no issue there.
  • If we want to compare the two games, it’s night and day.  I fail to see how, if playing SSB causes me to want to beat someone to a pulp with my bare hands, playing Mario Kart would not have a similar effect in making me want to drive around as if friction didn’t exist, power sliding around the turns and swerving everywhere to avoid the obstacles and any red shells on my tail.  What’s the difference?  Why is SSB so much more dangerous than Mario Kart?
  • Anyone who has even an average amount of gaming experience will agree that SSB is like Barbie Goes to the Mall when compared to games that are supposedly in its genre – say, Halo 3.  No comparison at all.  In fact, SSB is downright funny to play (turn off all items except for bob-ombs and remote bombs, and set their frequencies to “very high”. holy crap on a stick).
  • What’s nonviolent about dropping bombs, firing shells, and generally using any means necessary to ensure you defeat everyone else on the race track?  Is it just because everything’s brightly colored and painted with smiles?

The judge made the right call in saying that this teen was suffering from an addiction.  Just make sure, gentle reader, that you don’t associate this addiction any differently from a drug addiction.  The biochemical effects of an addiction are exactly the same, regardless of what the substance is that the addict desperately wants.

In closing, I’d have to say that this quote from a Slashdot reader regarding the case sums it up pretty well (as the defense lawyers argued Halo 3 caused the teen to believe his parents would simply respawn):

“Clearly Halo 3 is at fault. If they had some non-respawning game types this would never have happened…”

If you haven’t had your dose of stupidity yet, I’d invite you to check out this other Slashdot article regarding South Carolina’s recent decision to pursue a bill that would make the use of profanity a felony.

I even have a story from Facebook about gun control…but I think that’s another story for another time.  Instead, here’s something to brighten the general mood:


(Edit: Here’s yet another study that shows absolutely no correlation between violent video games and subsequent violent behavior.  I particularly like the bits about “moral panic” and politicians using violent video games to feign progress at their posts)


About Shannon Quinn

Oh hai!
This entry was posted in Articles, Gaming, Real Life and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Master Chief charged as an accessory

  1. eksith says:

    Well put!

    Charles Manson motivated a young group to kill a bunch innocent people (one of whome was a pregnant Sharon Tate) after hearing “Helter Skelter” by the Beetles and inferring its alleged hidden message of a race war.

    Mark Chapman was still clutching J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye as he gunned down John Lennon.

    David Berkowitz (Son of Sam) allegedly got the inspiration for a murder spree from his neighbor’s “demon dog”.

    One of my favorite video games (which I still play occasionally) is Quake III Arena. It’s really the only game I remember playing in high school. I think I played more, but I don’t remember any other titles.

    It was the most fun I’ve had in a game. Probably still is. It’s also one of the most violent games of its time. I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve played, and I even ran a server for quite a while.

    And yet, I’ve never had the inclination to murder anyone.
    There must be something wrong with me.

    I wonder how many of these anti-video game champions would claim watching “The Passion of The Christ” would motivate someone to commit murder.


  2. magsol says:

    Some of my favorite games of all time:

    -StarCraft (mmm, zerglings disintegrating)
    -WarCraft III (undead are just plain disturbing)
    -Quake (how to kill zombies? turn them into dog food!)
    -Quake IV (…where do I start)
    -Doom III (ditto; same engine, after all)
    -Jedi Outcast (not terribly gory, but still popping baddies with gleefully overpowered weapons and running them through with sabers)
    -Red Alert series (also not gory, but you’re building men and labeling them as statistical variables, not people)
    -Homeworld, Cataclysm, Homeworld 2 (ditto)
    -…and so on

    Judging from this curriculum vitae, I should be in a nut house by now. Every last one of these games was played intently from start to finish (often several times), along with significant online playing time (especially StarCraft, WarCraft III, Quake IV, and Jedi Outcast). You do the math.

    Obviously, the only plausible explanation is that you and I have an explosive subconscious that is just waiting to take control. Obviously.

  3. magsol says:

    Here we go:

    Ars Technica performed some surveys and posted an article about how violent video games has a neglible correspondence with subsequent violent behavior in kids and young adults.

    Ars Technica is about as reputable as you can get in the online technical world. Those folks know what they’re talking about.

  4. eksith says:

    HA! Justice!

    I doubt it would silence the fanatics, but should silence some of those fooled into believing the rhetoric.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s